4-Jun

Sick of up/down? Blame it on the 200 by Grant C

While day traders can embrace this up/down, up/down market, it makes swing traders dizzy. Frankly, I hate it and so does my account; and trading light, or not trading at all is my preferred approach in this type of market. While fundamentalists claim this back and forth action is caused by the ever changing news environment, as a technical analyst I know it is because the SPX is trapped by the 200 DEMA. The 200 DEMA (or DSMA, doesn’t really matter) is the line-in-the-sand for the epic battle between Bulls and Bears. Above the line live the Bulls, below the line live the Bears, and around SPX 200 is the battle ground with enough land mines to blow a swing trader’s account. The 200 is where the big institutions and hedge fund focus much of their buying and selling, and the battle goes on until one side wins and price moves far enough away so that they have to commit in size to a direction. So while the 200 acts like a magnet (for indexes and stocks), pulling price to it in either direction, once it is soundly breached, a trend develops. My guess is that this up/down action continues until the Bollinger Bands come together in a squeeze, then we emerge in a solid move. Unfortunately, there’s no way to tell at this point which direction we trend. Good luck, keep your helmet strapped, and save firepower for the trend move.

Find out more

2-Jun

Beware the Death Cross? by Grant C

I’m a sucker for market lore–those weird little myths and superstitions that surround traders and the financial markets. They remind me of the years I spent coaching youth baseball, another human activity shrouded in wisps of myth. In any case, a recent CNBC story line caught my attention that said, “Beware the Death Cross”. The article didn’t offer anything more than an analyst saying that he was worried because the 50 day moving average had turned and looked like it might cross down through the rising 200 MA, thus forming the bearish “Death Cross.” I’ve heard the whispers about the “Death Cross” for years, so I decided to go back and see if there was anything to it besides a wildly romantic label. Unfortunately, it does appear that significant things happen when the 50 DSMA crosses the 200 DSMA, in either direction.Let’s take a look at the monthly chart of the SPY. For the averages I used a 2 and 9 month EMA to simulate the 50 and 200 day averages (there’s about 22 trading days per month). On the left, the upward crossing in late 1996 marked the beginning of a huge rally. In late 1998, the averages tried and failed a crossing, and the rally resumed. The first true down crossing occurred in the summer of 2000, and the market just collapsed for 3 years. Finally, in early 2003, an upward crossing led to a 5-year rally that featured a steady upward grind where the averages bumped each other, but never crossed. Again, in late 2007, the averages crossed down, marking the sharp Bear market, which ended in spring of 2009. Now that the market has several daily closes below the 200 SMA, the 50-day average is heading down toward the 200, and the two should meet sometime this month.Now, one could argue that moving averages are lagging indicators, and their crossings are statistically meaningless. However, legend has it that billions of dollars of institutional money key off this simple moving average cross trading system, and traders should pay attention. Me? I come from French Catholic stock, and we’re like the Irish, or any baseball player, when it comes to legends, myths and fantasies. Count me Bearish if the Death Cross happens.

Find out more

1-Jun

IAG Cup and Handle – by: Steve M

IAGThe only real prevailing certainty in this market right now is VOLATILITY. This measurement of fear has seemed to put a nice floor under gold. Certainly the world’s quest for the ultimate refuge has taken a big chunk of volume from the other indices which continue their futile attempt at scaling the “wall of worry.” I think this will continue and the technical chart seems to agree. A classic Cup and Handle continuation pattern has formed on gold’s daily and it appears that the handle is almost complete and poised to break out. Also, with the manipulation associated with the Comex option expiration behind us and the dollar a bit Topy, the stars could be lined up. Furthermore, gold’s supply side is very limited, the production side is declining and the demand side is rising and has changed from jewelry demand to investment demand.So, moving into June, we could have the perfect storm for a launch to a new level for gold and gold equities.Take a look at IAG (Iamgold Corp.). The technicals mirror the $GOLD chart very well to serve as a proxy to the physical. WEEKLY: The share price rose to a high in December, pulled back to value, then ran up for a retest that failed. From the looks of the shallow retrace, it appears to be recharging for another run at the high. DAILY: The MACD-H is rising after it bottomed, following a price pull back which found support at the 150MA (forming the bottom of the handle). Next week I’m looking for an upside breakout, leading to a Fast/Slow EMA crossover and subsequent MACD MA x-over – both of which should help to ramp volume. At that point the gravity will let go and blue sky won’t be far away. We’ll see.Steve M

Find out more

30-May

1,2,3 Bottom entries

I was asked by a Spike Member to write a few comments about entering the 1,2,3 Bottom or 1,2,3 Top patterns. The thing to remember about is that these are reversal patterns, not trend continuation patterns. As such, it really doesn’t pay to jump the gun and enter early, only to watch the set up collapse. I prefer to enter on a show of strength to confirm the pattern. So, I look to enter on a market close above the #3 move if a bottom, or to short below it if a top. In the case of SRS, a trader would enter around 26.61 on the 5/14 close. I would exit four days later around 31, and look to buy again on the pullback to the rising MA. Stop goes below the pattern at around 24. Occasionally, there is a trend continuation entry above the #2 high, but in this case, I would consider re-entering if price closes above the 20 MA again in a narrow-range day.

Find out more

25-May

A Turn Is Coming?

[ an email from Kim, a SpikeTrade Member in Wisconsin ]The aftermath of the British Petroleum oil spill has made me feel very sad and very ill for some days.The effects are devastating to wildlife, sea life, fishermen, and general morale — given the lack of preparedness, apparent incompetence, and apparent lack of leadership in dealing with the crisis promptly and effectively. Frankly, I think the North-South Korean submarine trouble is being played up as a distraction to this massive environmental disaster.But what I wanted to say as regards the stocks markets is that, if they get that thing capped tomorrow, there may be a substantial rally. If I had any short positions myself, I would at least temporarily close them prior to developments in capping the oil leak Wednesday or whenever it happens. You may make more money if they fail, and we might then have a super-crash with everything else going on: but the current co-operation between the U.S. and China is affecting some China related stocks in a mildly positive fashion, and if this dove-tails with a success in capping that oil spill, I would think it would be quite positive.Just wanted to say, beware irrational exuberance when the oil leak is stopped!All the other problems will still be there, but this situation now is just intolerable. I have to confess, when I saw on TV the administration having music day at the White House on Saturday, our President and his wife and the Vice-President watching “Stevie Wonder” and others perform — when nothing effective had yet been done to stop the oil spill — it did call to mind Nero fiddling while Rome burned, as the old myth went. I know they had the very best intentions and it was planned long ago and couldn’t be changed, but it just seemed inappropriate considering the grave situation… Well, we know I’m no politician!Kim B

Find out more

17-May

Is the MACD-H divergence valid? by Grant C

Recently I read a highly respected trader comments about how his quantified studies showed that indicator divergence was a Wall Street myth. It stopped me cold since I use weekly MACD-H divergence. I decided to reexamine the concept, and went back to the weekly SPY data since late 1999, using Alex’s classic definition–a higher high in price with a lower high in weekly MACD-H, separated by a retracement below the zero line that “breaks the back of the bull”. I used Alex’s traditional, 8,11,15 calculations. Bullish divergences are reversed. I think of weekly MACD-H as institutional accumulation–if it rises, the Generals are buying, if it declines the Generals are selling. So, a bearish divergence means the Generals have tucked in and are probably distributing shares or locking in profits. Starting in late 1999, I counted 13 distinct bearish weekly MACD-H divergences, including 3 that marked primary market tops–Jan 2000, Oct 2007, and April 2010. Each of the 3 primary tops formed complex divergence patterns that involved multiple lower MACD-H highs, and each were also major 1,2,3 Top patterns.There were 3 bullish divergences, July 2002, July 2008, and Jan 2009. July 2002 and Jan 2009 were major bottoms, July 2008 was an intermediate bottom. While there are probably different ways to interpret these events and clarity is often elusive; simply shorting the SPY at each divergence would have been very profitable. After this little study, I’m more confident than ever in the weekly MACD-H

Find out more

15-May

One way to approach oil by Grant C

With Europe’s woes and the dollars fluctuations, the price of oil is getting tossed about like a toy in a dog’s mouth. Since as Spikers we don’t pick commodities, I thought I would share my”oil trade” plan in case others are interested. My tools of choice are the ProShares oil-price-based 2x ETFs, UCO for long the price of oil and SCO for short the price of oil. Both trade in size, are liquid, and offer excellent short-term trades. My take is that the price of oil is range-bound, roughly trapped from around $68-70 to $80-82 dollars per barrel. It takes several weeks to claw to the the top of the range, only to suffer violent and sudden declines to the bottom. I anticipate this behavior to be long-term, offering a rich, though probably boring, trading environment. After last week’s European panic, oil plunged to the low end of the range, and I’m looking to buy on a spike below UCO 10–maybe in the 9.60-9.70 range. If we find support, I intend to trade UCO from the long side on a short-term basis as we grind higher. UCO and SCO can have extended ranges, so quantities will be small.

Find out more

Subscribe to Our Updates

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy

SpikeTrade © 2024. All Rights Reserved.